Category: BNN

Springdale, Arkansas – The Law Office of Jason M. Hatfield in Springdale has obtained a ruling awarding additional medical benefits to an injured worker in a disputed workers’ compensation case, according to an opinion issued in the matter.

The decision, issued by the Arkansas Workers’ Compensation Commission, directs the employer’s insurance carrier to provide continued medical treatment and related benefits for the claimant’s work-related injuries. The ruling follows a contested hearing in which the parties presented evidence on the necessity of ongoing care and the carrier’s prior denial of additional treatment.

The claimant sustained injuries in the course and scope of employment and initially received medical care under the employer’s workers’ compensation coverage. A dispute later arose when the insurance carrier declined to authorize further treatment recommended by the treating physician. 

The claimant, represented by attorney Jason M. Hatfield, challenged the denial and sought an order requiring coverage of the proposed care. The Commission concluded that the claimant continued to require additional medical treatment that was reasonably necessary for the work-related injury, and that the employer and its carrier were responsible for providing those benefits under Arkansas law.

“This decision ensured that our client can move forward with the care their doctors have recommended,” Hatfield said in a statement. “Workers’ compensation exists so that injured employees are not left to navigate complex medical and legal issues on their own when they are hurt doing their jobs.”

Arkansas workers’ compensation law provides medical benefits and partial wage replacement to employees who suffer from compensable work-related injuries. Disputes commonly arise over the extent of necessary treatment, the duration of benefits, and whether a particular condition remains related to the original injury. Such disagreements are resolved through administrative proceedings before the Arkansas Workers’ Compensation Commission, with decisions based on the evidence submitted by both sides.

“Our workers’ compensation system functions only if legitimate claims receive timely medical attention,” Hatfield said. “The Commission’s order in this case reaffirms that when the evidence supports continued treatment for a work-related injury, those benefits should be provided.”

The Law Office of Jason M. Hatfield is based in Springdale and represents injured workers and accident victims across northwest Arkansas. The firm’s practice includes workers’ compensation claims, product liability, motor vehicle collisions, and other personal injury matters. Through administrative hearings and negotiated resolutions, the firm routinely appears before the Arkansas Workers’ Compensation Commission on behalf of employees seeking medical and wage-loss benefits after on-the-job injuries.

At the Law Office of Jason M. Hatfield, P.A., we are seasoned veterans of the Arkansas legal system. We have families who are proud to live, work, and play in Northwest Arkansas – from Springdale to Fayetteville.

Law Office of Jason M. Hatfield, P.A.
1025 E Don Tyson Pkwy
Springdale, AR 72764
(479) 888-4789
https://www.jhatfieldlaw.com/
Press Contact : Jason Hatfield

Distributed by Law Firm Newswire

San Francisco, California – Custom Legal Marketing (CLM), the legal marketing and law firm SEO agency behind the CLM Sequoia platform, has published results from a large-scale study looking at how much AI-generated content exists in Google’s top organic results for law firms and whether any of it is actually helping those pages rank.

CLM ran the study through its proprietary CLM Sequoia platform, pulling the top 5 organic Google results for 28 legal keywords across 24 major U.S. cities in February of 2026. Each law firm page in the dataset was then fed through Winston AI, which scored every page for AI-generated content percentage. CLM also captured word count and readability scores for each URL. When the dust settled, the working dataset covered 2,435 law firm ranking appearances, 1,618 unique URLs, and 1,021 unique domains across 8 practice areas including personal injury, criminal defense, family law, estate planning, business law, workers’ compensation, medical malpractice, and employment law.

The headline finding? AI content percentage and organic ranking position have no statistically significant connection. The Spearman correlation came back at r = 0.065 with a p-value of 0.138, which lands well above the 0.05 cutoff that would indicate a real relationship.

“For the past two years, the loudest conversation in legal marketing has been whether AI content helps or hurts your Google rankings,” said Jason Bland, Co-Founder and CEO of Custom Legal Marketing. “We went out and measured it across more than 2,400 ranking appearances. The answer turned out to be neither. You are not going to leapfrog your competitors by publishing AI content, and you are not going to get slapped for it either. The algorithm just does not care.”

Key Findings on AI Content and Law Firm Rankings

AI content shows up on nearly every ranking law firm page, but the way it distributes is striking. Roughly 54.7% of ranking pages have 5% or less AI-detected content. On the other end, 21.4% clock in at 70% or higher. What is missing is the middle. Fewer than one in four pages land in the 6 to 69% range. Rather than a gradual shift toward AI adoption, the industry appears to be splitting into two distinct camps: firms that barely use it and firms that use it for almost everything.

Of all the practice areas CLM studied, personal injury has the most AI content by a wide margin. The median AI detection for PI pages sits at 14%, which is roughly five times the 3% median across all practice areas. Not a single personal injury law firm page in the top 5 results came back clean. Every one of them had some detectable AI content. Criminal defense, on the other hand, looks completely different. Eighty-seven percent of pages ranking at Position 1 for criminal defense keywords had less than 10% AI, making it the most human-written category in the study.

The data points toward a blended workflow as the strongest approach. Pages landing in the 26 to 50% AI range, which likely reflects content where a writer used AI for drafting or research and then did heavy editing, posted the best average ranking position at 2.83 and the highest average word count at 2,958 words. Meanwhile, pages at the 71 to 100% AI level averaged only 1,561 words and ranked a bit worse at an average position of 3.23.

There is also a readability problem that firms using AI heavily need to know about. CLM found a correlation of r = -0.233 (p < 0.0001) between AI percentage and readability score. Put simply, the more AI on the page, the harder it is to read. That matters on its own, but it also matters because word count (r = -0.089, p = 0.042) turned out to have a stronger statistical tie to rankings than AI percentage did. Firms pumping out AI content without editing it down may be quietly undermining their own performance through readability issues they have never measured.

Where a firm is located also plays a role in how much AI content surrounds it in the search results. Columbus, OH came in as the biggest outlier at 59% mean AI content and a 76% median, most likely because national firms dominate the rankings there. On the low end, San Antonio (16.9%), Jacksonville (18.3%), and Houston (19.3%) had the least AI content, reflecting markets where regional and local firms still rely on traditionally written pages.

Study Methodology

CLM built the study inside Sequoia’s Research Tool, which runs regular studies to train its AI marketing platform.

The team executed all 672 keyword-city queries on mobile, matching how Google indexes and ranks pages under its mobile-first approach. Pages were scraped using a headless browser with an HTTP fallback for pages that resisted rendering. Winston AI handled the detection side, returning a percentage score for each page, estimating how much of the content appeared to be machine-generated. All told, CLM processed 1,889,828 words across the full law firm dataset. Of those, 615,934 words (32.6%) came back flagged as AI-generated.

The 24 cities in the study span the country: New York, Los Angeles, Chicago, Houston, Phoenix, Philadelphia, San Antonio, San Diego, Dallas, San Jose, Austin, Jacksonville, Fort Worth, Columbus, Charlotte, San Francisco, Indianapolis, Seattle, Denver, Boston, Nashville, El Paso, Detroit, and Oklahoma City.

Implications for Law Firms

Bland was blunt about what the findings should mean for how firms spend their marketing dollars. “What gets you from Position 5 to Position 1 in competitive legal markets has not changed. It is still domain authority, content that actually says something, pages people can read without a headache, strong E-E-A-T signals, and solid local SEO. AI content does not appear anywhere on that list. If a firm is pouring money into AI content production but ignoring editorial quality and link building, they are focused on the wrong thing.”

One other number stood out: 18.2% of Position 1 results for personal injury keywords came from pages with 70%+ AI content. But those pages belong to a handful of firms with enormous authority behind them, which strongly suggests it is the domain strength doing the work, not the AI-generated copy.

Custom Legal Marketing is a law firm marketing agency built for how clients actually find lawyers today. Founded in 2005, CLM combines award-winning creative with a purpose-built AI platform to help law firms stand out, get chosen, and grow in an increasingly competitive digital landscape.

Custom Legal Marketing
1111 Kearny Street
San Francisco, CA 94133
800-789-6451
https://custom.legal/knowledge/are-law-firms-using-ai-content-to-rank-at-the-top-of-google-search/
Press Contact : Media Contact

Distributed by Law Firm Newswire

Sugar Land, Texas – As St. Patrick’s Day celebrations approach, Lone Star Injury Attorneys is launching its “St. Patrick’s Day No DUI Regrets” campaign, a safety-focused initiative designed to help prevent alcohol-impaired driving and keep communities safe.

As part of the campaign, the firm is giving away 50 free Uber ride vouchers, each valued at $15, to help people get home safely after St. Patrick’s Day festivities. The initiative is aimed at reducing DUI-related crashes during a holiday that consistently sees elevated risks on the road.

According to national traffic safety data, St. Patrick’s Day has resulted in hundreds of alcohol-impaired driving fatalities in recent years, with nighttime hours posing the greatest danger. By providing free rides, Lone Star Injury Attorneys hopes to encourage responsible decisions before celebrations begin.

“St. Patrick’s Day should be about enjoying time with friends, not dealing with the consequences of a preventable crash,” said Max Paderewski, founder of the firm. “We see firsthand how devastating drunk driving accidents can be. This campaign is about giving people a simple way to make a safer choice.”

The Uber vouchers are available on a first-come, first-served basis and are limited to one per person. Participants must complete a short registration form in advance to be eligible.

How to Participate

Sign up in advance: Visit the St. Patrick’s Day campaign page and complete the brief form to request a voucher.

Use your voucher on St. Patrick’s Day: Apply it toward a safe ride home during the holiday.

Share the initiative: Encourage friends and family to plan ahead and celebrate responsibly.

Headquartered in Sugar Land, Texas, Lone Star Injury Attorneys represents injury victims across Texas and beyond. In addition to aggressive legal advocacy, the firm is committed to community outreach efforts that promote safety, prevention, and responsible decision-making during high-risk holidays.

Lone Star Injury Attorneys
12808 West Airport Blvd
Suite 255F Sugar Land, TX 77478
(832) 482-0035
https://lonestarinjuryattorneys.com/
Press Contact : Rafael Dela Cruz

Distributed by Law Firm Newswire

San Francisco, California – A new study from law firm marketing agency, Custom Legal Marketing, has found that Google PageSpeed performance scores show virtually no correlation with organic search ranking position for law firms in competitive markets. The research, conducted through CLM’s proprietary AI marketing law firm marketing platform, Sequoia represents the largest known analysis of page speed and search performance focused specifically on the legal industry.

The study analyzed 1,750 search engine results pages across 50 of the largest U.S. metropolitan markets, covering 11 high-volume personal injury keywords spanning three practice areas: general personal injury, motor vehicle accidents, and premises liability. Researchers captured the top five organic results for each of 350 keyword-city combinations, then measured each ranking URL against the Google PageSpeed Insights API. In total, 1,328 unique URLs from 653 distinct domains were evaluated across eight performance metrics including PageSpeed Performance Score, Largest Contentful Paint (LCP), First Contentful Paint (FCP), Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS), Total Blocking Time, Speed Index, mobile-friendliness, and HTTPS status.

The headline finding was a Pearson correlation coefficient of -0.0705 between PageSpeed performance scores and ranking position. To put that in perspective, the famously absurd correlation between Nicolas Cage film releases and swimming pool drownings is nearly ten times stronger. In practical terms, -0.0705 rounds to what it is: zero.

Nearly 65% of Top Ranking Law Firm Sites Fail Core Web Vitals

Among the study’s most striking findings was the performance of pages that hold the number one ranking position. Of the 340 pages occupying Position 1 across all searches, 64.7 percent received a “Poor” grade on Google’s own Largest Contentful Paint metric, meaning their primary content took longer than four seconds to render. Only 14.7 percent of Position 1 results met Google’s “Good” threshold of under 2.5 seconds for LCP.

The average PageSpeed score across all 1,750 top-five results was 64.9 out of 100, falling squarely within what Google classifies as the “Needs Improvement” range. The difference in average score between Position 1 (66.6) and Position 5 (64.1) was just 2.5 points on a 100-point scale.

Individual cases further illustrated the disconnect. One law firm page scored a perfect 100 on PageSpeed and ranked at Position 5 for its keyword, while a page scoring 28 held the Position 1 spot for a comparable keyword in a different market. The 72-point gap and nearly 11-fold difference in load time between the two pages did not translate into any ranking advantage for the faster site.

When CLM examined performance distributions by keyword, no consistent pattern emerged across the seven primary search terms analyzed. For car accident-related keywords, Position 1 results did show higher average scores than Position 5, but for medical malpractice keywords, the pattern was reversed. For slip and fall searches, the variation across all five positions fell within a 4.1-point range, suggesting random noise rather than a systematic relationship.

The study’s methodology was designed to isolate the relationship between speed and rankings within a single competitive vertical, eliminating the cross-industry noise that can confound broader studies. All data was collected in February of 2026, using live Google searches with geographic targeting to simulate local search behavior.

Custom Legal Marketing published the full study, including detailed breakdowns by keyword, city, domain type, and individual Core Web Vitals, through CLM Sequoia, its research and marketing intelligence platform built exclusively for the legal industry.

You can read the full report on Does Page Speed Matter for Law Firm SEO in Custom Legal Marketing’s knowledge bank.

Custom Legal Marketing is a law firm marketing agency built for how clients actually find lawyers today. Founded in 2005, CLM combines award-winning creative with a purpose-built AI platform to help law firms stand out, get chosen, and grow in an increasingly competitive digital landscape.

Custom Legal Marketing
1111 Kearny Street
San Francisco, CA 94133
800-789-6451
https://custom.legal/
Press Contact : Media Contact

Distributed by Law Firm Newswire

Covington, Georgia – Petrelli Previtera, LLC, has announced the promotion of LeAnne P. Cooper, Esq. to Partner. LeAnne is based in the firm’s Covington office and brings more than twenty years of experience in family law to the partnership.

Throughout her career, LeAnne has represented clients in complex divorce, custody, support, adoption, and post-decree matters. She is known for her strategic approach, clear communication, and ability to guide families through challenging transitions with confidence and care.

“LeAnne has consistently demonstrated the level of excellence, leadership, and client commitment that defines our firm,” said Thomas Petrelli, founder and CEO. “She understands that our work is not simply about legal outcomes, but about helping people navigate one of the most difficult periods of their lives with clarity and strength.”

Melinda Previtera, co-founder and Managing Partner, added, “LeAnne brings both strategic insight and compassion to her clients and colleagues. Her ability to lead with confidence and empathy reflects exactly what we stand for as a firm. We are proud to welcome her to the partnership.”

LeAnne has played an important role in strengthening the firm’s Georgia practice, including supporting the firm’s recent expansion into a larger Covington office to better serve the community. Before joining Petrelli Previtera, she led her own practice for more than fifteen years and served as a Special Assistant Attorney General for the State of Georgia.

“I am honored to step into this role,” LeAnne said. “Helping families through change is meaningful work, and I look forward to continuing to serve the Georgia community as part of this team.”

Her promotion reflects the firm’s continued investment in experienced, client-centered leadership as Petrelli Previtera expands its reach and impact across Georgia and beyond.

Founded in 2017, Petrelli Previtera, LLC is a nationally recognized law firm serving clients in family law and estate matters. The firm provides strategic guidance, clear communication, and strong advocacy to individuals and families navigating complex legal transitions. For more information, visit www.petrellilaw.com.

Petrelli Previtera, LLC
6232 Turner Lake Rd. NW, Covington, GA 30014
(678) 730-6310
https://www.petrellilaw.com
Press Contact : Envoca Search Marketing

Distributed by Law Firm Newswire

Naperville, Illinois – John J. Malm & Associates, a leading Illinois personal injury law firm, announced today that five of its attorneys, John J. Malm, Rachel Legorreta, Sara Bendoff, Alyssa Pullara, and Marilynn Frangella, have been named to the 2026 Super Lawyers list, a distinction awarded to a limited percentage of attorneys statewide who demonstrate professional excellence and peer recognition. The selection highlights the firm’s depth of experience and commitment to clients across Illinois.

The Super Lawyers designation is one of the legal profession’s most respected honors. Attorneys are evaluated through a comprehensive, multi-stage selection process that includes peer nominations, independent research, and review by legal professionals within the same practice areas. Only a small fraction of attorneys in Illinois earn recognition each year.

For John J. Malm & Associates, the selection of five attorneys in the same year underscores the firm’s strong reputation within the legal community and reflects the breadth of experience available to its clients.

“What makes this recognition meaningful is that it comes from other lawyers who understand the demands of this work,” said John J. Malm, founder of the firm. “It speaks not just to individual accomplishments, but to the culture we’ve built, one that prioritizes preparation, integrity, and relentless advocacy for our clients.”

A Recognition Built on Peer Evaluation and Professional Achievement

Super Lawyers is not a popularity contest or a marketing award. The selection process is designed to identify attorneys who have earned respect through their professional conduct, legal ability, and results. Candidates are assessed on numerous indicators, including verdicts and settlements, experience, honors, continuing legal education, and peer evaluations.

Attorneys may be nominated by colleagues or identified through independent research, but final selections are made only after extensive review. The result is a curated list intended to reflect attorneys who have distinguished themselves in their practice areas.

For clients seeking legal representation, Super Lawyers recognition serves as an independent indicator of professional standing, one that complements, rather than replaces, a lawyer’s track record and commitment to client service.

A Team-Based Achievement, Not an Individual One

While the Super Lawyers designation is awarded individually, John J. Malm & Associates views the honor as a collective achievement. The firm’s attorneys work collaboratively, sharing insight, strategy, and experience across cases. That team-based approach ensures that each client benefits from the firm’s combined knowledge rather than relying on a single perspective.

“No case is ever handled in isolation,” Malm explained. “Our lawyers challenge each other, support each other, and work together to make sure every client’s case is thoroughly prepared. This recognition reflects that collaborative effort.”

The five attorneys recognized this year represent a range of experience levels and professional backgrounds, reinforcing the firm’s depth and long-term stability.

Meet the Attorneys Recognized by Super Lawyers

John J. Malm

As founder of John J. Malm & Associates, John J. Malm has built a career centered on trial readiness, strategic litigation, and client advocacy. Known for his hands-on approach, Malm remains actively involved in complex personal injury and wrongful death cases, ensuring that each matter is prepared as if it will proceed to trial.

His leadership has shaped the firm’s philosophy: cases are not settled simply for convenience, and clients are never pressured into decisions without a full understanding of their legal options.

“Our responsibility is to give clients clear, honest advice and to be fully prepared for every outcome,” Malm said. “That approach doesn’t change based on the size of the case or the identity of the defendant.”

Marilynn Frangella

Marilynn Frangella brings experience, sound judgment, and steady leadership to her practice. She is respected for her ability to assess cases realistically while still pursuing maximum accountability for negligent parties.

Clients value her clear communication style and her commitment to ensuring they understand both the legal process and the potential outcomes of their cases.

Rachel Legorreta

Rachel Legorreta is recognized for her meticulous preparation and ability to guide clients through the legal process with clarity and confidence. She is known for balancing compassion with firm advocacy, ensuring that clients feel informed and supported while their cases are aggressively pursued.

Her work often involves navigating complex liability issues and managing high-stakes negotiations, where attention to detail and strategic planning are critical.

Sara Bendoff

Sara Bendoff brings a thoughtful, analytical approach to litigation. Her work is characterized by careful case development, thorough legal research, and persistence in advancing her clients’ interests.

Colleagues and peers respect her ability to identify key issues early in a case and develop strategies that position clients for the strongest possible outcome, whether through settlement or trial.

Alyssa Pullara

Alyssa Pullara has earned recognition for her modern, methodical approach to litigation. Known for strong preparation and effective advocacy, she handles cases involving serious injuries and complex factual scenarios.

Her ability to integrate legal analysis with practical case strategy has made her a valued member of the firm’s litigation team and a trusted advocate for clients navigating difficult circumstances.

What This Recognition Means for Clients

For individuals and families facing serious injuries, choosing an attorney can feel overwhelming. Awards alone do not guarantee results, but peer-reviewed recognitions such as Super Lawyers provide insight into how attorneys are regarded within the legal community.

At John J. Malm & Associates, the Super Lawyers selections reaffirm the firm’s long-standing commitment to:

• Thorough investigation and case preparation
• Honest, straightforward communication with clients
• Strategic negotiation backed by trial readiness
• Ethical advocacy and professional accountability

These principles guide every case, regardless of size or complexity.

A Firm Culture Focused on Preparation and Accountability

John J. Malm & Associates has built its reputation by preparing cases as though they will be tried before a jury. This approach strengthens negotiating positions and ensures that clients are never left unprepared if litigation becomes necessary.

The firm invests significant time and resources into case development, expert analysis, and legal research. Attorneys collaborate regularly, sharing insights and strategies to strengthen outcomes for clients.

“Preparation is respect, for the client, for the court, and for the process,” Malm said. “When we prepare thoroughly, we honor the trust our clients place in us.”

Continued Commitment to Illinois Communities

Beyond individual cases, John J. Malm & Associates remains committed to serving Illinois communities through advocacy, education, and accountability. The firm represents clients across a wide range of personal injury matters, always with the goal of promoting safety and responsible conduct.

The Super Lawyers recognition reinforces the firm’s standing as a trusted advocate for individuals who have been harmed by negligence and are seeking justice under Illinois law.

While the firm is honored by the Super Lawyers selections, its focus remains firmly on the future and on the clients it serves every day. The attorneys at John J. Malm & Associates continue to refine their strategies, expand their knowledge, and uphold the professional standards that earned this recognition.

“Recognition is never the end goal,” Malm emphasized. “The goal is doing right by our clients, every single time. If we stay focused on that, everything else follows.”

John J. Malm & Associates is an Illinois personal injury firm that serves clients throughout the Chicagoland area and its western suburbs with offices in Naperville and St. Charles. Our top-rated personal injury lawyers represent injured victims of automobile accidents, medical malpractice, product liability, work injuries, nursing home abuse and neglect, dog attacks, slip & fall/premises liability, wrongful death, and other accident and injury claims.

John J. Malm & Associates Personal Injury Lawyers
1730 Park Street Suite 201
Naperville, Illinois 60563
630-527-4177
https://www.malmlegal.com
Press Contact : John Malm

Distributed by Law Firm Newswire

Joliet, Illinois – Briskman Briskman & Greenberg has filed a civil lawsuit against the city of Joliet on behalf of a bicyclist who says he was injured after riding into a large hole in the roadway on the city’s near west side.

According to a complaint filed in Will County Circuit Court and reported by Patch, the plaintiff suffered serious injuries while riding his bicycle in the 1400 block of North Center Street. The lawsuit seeks a judgment of more than $50,000.

The plaintiff is represented by attorney Susan Fransen of Briskman Briskman & Greenberg. The suit names the city of Joliet as the sole defendant and alleges negligence and willful and wanton conduct in connection with the condition of the roadway.

At all relevant times, the city “owned, maintained and or controlled the roadway … and had an obligation to repair said defect, especially as it caused it and had actual or constructive notice of the same,” according to the filing. The lawsuit contends the city failed to repair the alleged defect or warn road users of the hazard.

The complaint further alleges that Joliet failed to maintain the roadway “in a safe and reasonable manner” and did not conduct adequate inspections that would have identified and addressed the hole. It characterizes the city’s “failure to repair this road where it created the defective condition or had notice of the same” as “willful and wanton conduct.”

“Roadways that cities own and control must be kept reasonably safe for the people who use them, whether they are driving, walking, or riding a bicycle,” Fransen said in a statement. “The complaint filed on behalf of my client alleges that the city knew or should have known about this dangerous condition and failed to address it.”

The case centers on whether Joliet had notice of the alleged roadway defect and whether the city’s actions or inaction meet the legal standards for municipal liability under Illinois law. No trial date has been set, and the city has not yet filed its formal response to the complaint.

CASE INFORMATION

Will County Circuit Court
Jarell D. Doss v. City of Joliet
Case No. 2026LA000051

The attorneys at Briskman Briskman & Greenberg Personal Injury & Car Accident Lawyers have successfully represented individuals and families who have been injured or lost loved ones as a result of someone’s carelessness or a workplace accident. We have achieved success in thousands of cases, recovering millions of dollars in damages for our clients in a wide variety of cases, including personal injury, car accidents, wrongful death, medical malpractice, pharmacy errors, dog bite injuries, and work injuries.

Briskman Briskman & Greenberg Personal Injury & Car Accident Lawyers
205 W Randolph St Suite 925
Chicago, IL 60606
1 (312) 313-2414
https://www.briskmanandbriskman.com/
Press Contact : Paul Greenberg

Distributed by Law Firm Newswire

North Charleston, South Carolina – The Steinberg Law Firm is pleased to announce that its 2026 College Scholarship Program is now open. This year’s program offers a total of three (3) $2,000 scholarships to high school seniors and current college students who are residents of Berkeley, Dorchester, and Charleston counties.

The scholarship program reflects two of the law firm’s core values: supporting education and giving back to the community.

This will be the ninth year the firm has offered the program. Entries will be selected based on GPA, a written essay, extracurricular activities, honors, awards, and community involvement.

This year, students can choose from one of two prompts:

• Tell us how you are making a difference in your community, school, or the world today.
• Tell us about an experience overcoming a personal challenge and how you did it.

Past scholarship recipients have attended Clemson University, the University of South Carolina, the College of Charleston, Charleston Southern University, Methodist University, Anderson University, and Winthrop University, among many others.

“Education creates opportunities that can shape a student’s future,” said Managing Partner and Attorney Michael Jordan. “Through scholarships, we hope to help ease financial burdens so students can pursue their goals and turn their aspirations into achievement.”

Three students will be selected by the Steinberg Law Firm Scholarship Committee. The application deadline is March 16, 2026. To apply, visit the Scholarship Program page on the firm’s website. 

The Steinberg Law Firm was founded by Irving Steinberg in 1927, based on a commitment to serving injured people in the Lowcountry. Since then, the firm has expanded its reach throughout South Carolina. Attorney Steinberg advocated for all people, regardless of their background or where they came from, and believed in giving back to the community that so generously supported him and the firm in the beginning. The firm continues to uphold these original, founding values today and gives back to the community through this scholarship program and community involvement events throughout the local tri-county area.

The firm is best known for helping injury victims who have been injured either on the job or due to the negligence of others. If you or a loved one has been injured, contact the Steinberg Law Firm’s personal injury or workers’ compensation attorneys today at (843) 720-2800. The firm has three offices located in North Charleston, Goose Creek, and Summerville, and offers free consultations. The firm does not collect a fee unless it wins your case.

The Steinberg Law Firm has been assisting victims of negligence in South Carolina since 1927 including personal injury, workers’ compensation, and car accidents. For more information, please contact the firm at 843-720-2800 or visit our website at https://www.steinberglawfirm.com/.

Steinberg Law Firm
3955 Faber Place Drive, Suite 300, North Charleston, SC 29405,
118 S Goose Creek Blvd., Goose Creek, SC 29445,
103 Grandview Drive, Summerville, SC 29483
(843) 871-6522
pbaron@steinberglawfirm.com
https://www.steinberglawfirm.com/
Press Contact : Patricia Baron

Distributed by Law Firm Newswire

From Zero to Pilot in Just 40 Hours

CHICAGO, IL– A new safety report released today by The Kryder Law Group, LLC Accident and Injury Lawyers highlights a significant disparity in training standards between private pilots and commercial driver’s license (CDL) holders across the Midwest. The analysis suggests that the less rigorous training requirements for private pilots are a major contributing factor to the high accident rate in general aviation compared to the commercial trucking industry.

The report compares federal and state-level requirements in ten Midwestern states, including Illinois, Indiana, and Wisconsin. The findings indicate that while CDL drivers must undergo extensive, structured training programs often exceeding 160 hours to operate semi-trucks, private pilots can legally carry passengers with a minimum of just 40 hours of flight time.

• Private Pilot: ~40 flight hours minimum total training time.
• CDL Driver: ~160+ hours typical training program.
• New Teen Driver Training: ~50+ hours in most Midwestern states.

This comprehensive analysis connects the high number of general aviation accidents to pilot inexperience. While commercial trucking regulations have evolved to demand rigorous classroom instruction and mandatory behind-the-wheel hours, private pilot certification remains accessible with significantly less preparation. The report argues that this gap in training standards leaves many private pilots ill-equipped to handle complex situations in the air, leading to preventable accidents.

“When you look at the numbers, it is clear that we demand more from the drivers next to us on the highway than we do from the pilots flying private planes overhead,” said Andrew Kryder, Esq., founding partner of The Kryder Law Group, LLC. “Our goal with this report is to show that safety outcomes are directly linked to the quality and duration of training. Raising the bar for pilot certification could save lives and prevent devastating accidents for families across the Midwest.”

The full report is available for review, offering detailed state-by-state comparisons and insights into how improved training standards can enhance safety for everyone.

Publication: Safety Report: Private Pilot vs. CDL Training Standards

The Kryder Law Group, LLC Accident and Injury Lawyers represents injury victims in Chicago and throughout Illinois and the Midwest. The firm handles a wide variety of personal injury cases including truck crashes and aviation accidents. The team is dedicated to helping clients navigate the legal process and securing the compensation they deserve.

The Kryder Law Group, LLC Accident and Injury Lawyers
134 North LaSalle St. Suite 1515
Chicago, Illinois 60602
312-223-1700
akryder@kryderlaw.com
https://www.kryderlaw.com/
Press Contact : Andrew Kryder, Esq.

Distributed by Law Firm Newswire

Andover, Massachusetts – The Cummings Foundation, in collaboration with the Massachusetts School of Law (MSLAW), proudly announces the return of its free public seminar series designed to help local business owners, entrepreneurs, and professionals strengthen their operations through sound legal and management strategies.

The Winter 2026 session, titled “Good Business Practices & Preventing Problem Employees,” will take place on Thursday, March 26, from 5:15 p.m. to 7:15 p.m. at the Massachusetts School of Law, Room 204. Food will be provided.

The night will begin with welcoming remarks by Michael L. Coyne, Dean of Massachusetts School of Law, and continue with instruction from a team of MSLAW business and legal experts. Topics will include:

• Establishing Systems for Documenting Performance and Discipline (Michael Leamy – Professor of Business)
• Harassment, Bullying, Violence, and OSHA’s General Duty Clause (Paula Colby-Clements – Professor of Law)
• Piercing The Corporate Veil (Joseph Devlin, Professor of Law)
• Agent Liability on Instruments (Amy Dimitriadis – Professor of Law)
• Mental Health Issues in the Workplace (Shane Rodriguez – Professor of Law)

The Winter 2026 session will be the 6th installment in The Cummings Business Law Seminar Series in partnership with MSLAW to educate the public on the interplay between business and law.

The event is free and open to the public, but registration is required. Prospective attendees can scan the QR Code below to sign up, or RSVP directly to Diane Sullivan at dianes@mslaw.edu.

The Massachusetts School of Law in Andover is dedicated to providing affordable, accessible legal education that emphasizes practical training, ethics, and public service.

The Cummings Foundation, founded by Bill and Joyce Cummings of Cummings Properties, supports hundreds of nonprofits throughout Massachusetts, funding initiatives that strengthen local communities and foster education and opportunity.

Massachusetts School of Law
500 Federal Street
Andover, MA 01810
(978) 681-0800
dianes@mslaw.edu
https://www.mslaw.edu/
Press Contact : Diane Sullivan

Distributed by Law Firm Newswire